Product Design Lead
@Commonwelth.im
Web3 Governance Infrastructure
SaaS + Blockchain
Self-Serve Growth Initiative
jess.c.mtz@gmail.com
↗
↗
Re-Architecting Community Creation for Scalable Web3 Governance
Snapshot
Role
Product Design Lead, owned end to end redesign of community creation, facilitated cross functional product decisions, and shaped long term governance direction.
Objective
Shift from Growth led manual onboarding to a scalable, self serve community creation model to support expansion from large enterprise crypto communities to smaller, emerging on chain groups.
Key Contraints
Irreversible blockchain selection at creation, wallet and ecosystem compatibility dependencies, token based governance architecture, and high technical expectations from advanced Web3 users.
Key Contraints
Launched a re-architected multi-step creation flow that reduced friction and enabled scalable self serve onboarding, broke a cycle of stalled delivery, and surfaced strategic limitations in the single chain, platform token model, informing the next evolution toward more flexible governance infrastructure.
Case Study

Community Creation Step 1 → Clarified blockchain selection and wallet compatibility at the point of decision, turning irreversible Web3 constraints into guided, informed choices.
Commonwealth was shifting from Growth-led, manual onboarding of large crypto communities to a scalable, self-serve model aimed at smaller and emerging on-chain communities. As Product Design Lead, I was tasked with overhauling the community creation experience under a compressed timeline, aligning the product with Series B growth goals while navigating the complexity of Web3 governance and blockchain infrastructure.
The existing flow was brittle and confusing, even for advanced crypto users. A core friction point was the dependency between wallet compatibility and blockchain selection, a technical constraint that could not be reversed once a community was created. I led a full audit and re-architecture of the experience, facilitating cross-functional debate around sequencing decisions and long-term implications. The redesigned multi-step flow reduced cognitive load while preserving necessary blockchain constraints, and introduced clearer decision framing around governance setup and token configuration.
From the outset, we were aware that many communities preferred to use their own tokens. However, we made a deliberate strategic bet to launch with a platform-first token model, believing a standardized token could create shared incentives and simplify governance across communities. The redesigned creation flow supported this structure, but adoption patterns made the preference clear. Communities did not want to operate within a shared platform token framework. They wanted autonomy over their own tokens and governance structures. This learning reframed community creation as more than a UX challenge. It exposed a platform-level strategy decision and directly informed the next evolution toward flexible, community-owned token architecture.

Established clear wallet ownership at community creation, ensuring governance authority is tied to a compatible on chain identity from the start.

Community Creation Step 2 → Introduced guided chain selection with contextual education, preventing misconfiguration before community launch.

Community Creation Step 3a → Framed community stake as an opt in governance mechanism, making funding and voting power dynamics explicit before launch.

Community Creation Step 3b → Translated complex smart contract execution into a guided signing flow, preserving transparency while minimizing technical friction.

Community Creation Complete → Closed the creation loop with a clear success state and immediate next steps, bridging community launch to active governance.
More Projects
Scaling a Beta Experiment into a Core Growth Engine
AI-Powered Renovation Planning
@Block Renovation
↗
Designing Operational Infrastructure for Scalable SMA Growth
Finance | Advisor Portal
@Code and Thoery
↗